+1

Done:
- Signature verified
- Built succesfully
- Tested

Cheers
Hasan


On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]>
wrote:

> PGP signature now verified.
>
> I'll change my vote to a 0 assuming the md5 and/or sha1 files makes it
> to dist. :-)
>
>
>
> On 25 April 2016 at 07:52, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Stian
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing the release candidate.
> >
> > The *.asc file was indeed a duplicate of the zip, I've replaced it.
> >
> > The md5 is in the mail only as it seems pointless to make this available
> > over the same channel as the file it allows verifying. Only verifying
> > the gpg-signature gives a reasonable degree of certainty that the file
> > is genuine.
> >
> > Your other criticism is indeed justified but doesn't seem to be in any
> > way related to the specific release. And given that it was like that in
> > all the previous releases and considering that a major tidying up should
> > take place after releasing I would say that they are no impediment to
> > releasing this now.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Reto
> >
> > On Sun, 24 Apr 2016, at 20:40, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> >> I agree on the principle for this release :-)
> >>
> >> But sorry, this was a -1 for me. (unbinding)
> >>
> >> I could not check
> >>
> http://home.apache.org/~reto/clerezza-release-201604/201604-1-src.zip.asc
> >> is it is just a duplicate the ZIP file, not the much smaller .asc file
> >> - so I can't verify the signature.
> >>
> >>
> >> Probably a home.apache.org httpd issue..which btw should not be used
> >> for release candidates anymore.
> >>
> >> Perhaps using https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/clerezza/ would
> >> work better? It would also then be clearer as to what would end up on
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/clerezza/ as what folder
> >> and filenames - I must admit "201604-1-src.zip" is not an ideal
> >> filename for me (apache-clerezza-partial-201604-1-src.zip ?)
> >>
> >> *.md5 and *.sha1 files are also missing.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Checked:
> >>
> >> -1 pgp signature
> >> -1 sha1 signature file missing
> >> -1 src archive includes pom.xml.releaseBackup files
> >> 0 md5 matches (but *.md5 file missing)
> >> +1 mvn clean install -> BUILD SUCCESS
> >> +1 git tag (commit) 2a3643d2b51e74f43d2a3c921f95f61fad355d94 matches
> >> src (for the included modules)
> >> +1 no binaries in src (beyond 3 pngs)
> >> -1 rdf/jena/facade/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png is the logo
> >> of former http://www.trialox.org as shown on
> >> https://startupmonitor.ch/startups/1007/trialox/   - is this Apache
> >> licensed? Not mentioned in NOTICE. Why should an Apache product be
> >> Trialox branded?
> >> +1 mvn staging repository jar filenames match */target/*jar (+javadoc)
> >> -1 apache-rat check not too happy (missing headers include
> >> src/assembly/source-release.xml, some test resources and
> >>
> rdf/jena/tdb.storage/src/test/java/org/apache/clerezza/rdf/jena/tdb/storage/*.java
> >> - last one causes my -1 here)
> >>
> >>
> >> For the RAT check I would expect the XML apache header in *.xml and
> >> *.rdf  and with # in *.nt (or these test resources should be
> >> rat-excluded). *.java must always have headers.
> >>
> >>
> >> btw - that trialox 'clerrezza.png' is also duplicated in:
> >>
> >> ./utils.customproperty/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png
> >> ./templating.seedsnipe/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png
> >> ./rdf/core/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png
> >> ./rdf/jena/facade/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png
> >> ./platform/usermanager/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png
> >>
> ./platform/usermanager.webinterface/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png
> >> ./platform/typepriority/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png
> >> ./platform/typehandlerspace/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png
> >> ./platform/launcher.virtuoso/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png
> >> ./platform/launcher.tdb/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png
> >>
> ./platform/launcher.storageless.parent/platform.launcher.storageless/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png
> >> ./platform/launcher.sesame/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png
> >> ./platform/launcher.mulgara/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png
> >>
> ./platform/dashboard/platform.dashboard.core/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png
> >>
> ./platform/accountcontrolpanel/platform.accountcontrolpanel.core/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png
> >>
> >> e.g.
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/clerezza/blob/master/rdf/jena/facade/src/site/resources/images/clerezza.png
> >>
> >>
> >> Tested with:
> >>
> >> Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
> >> 2015-11-10T16:41:47+00:00)
> >> Maven home: /home/stain/software/maven
> >> Java version: 1.8.0_72-internal, vendor: Oracle Corporation
> >> Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre
> >> Default locale: en_GB, platform encoding: UTF-8
> >> OS name: "linux", version: "3.16.0-67-generic", arch: "amd64", family:
> >> "unix"
> >>
> >> On 23 April 2016 at 12:24, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > This is bug-fix release that fixes the wrong handling of literals with
> >> > language in stable-serializer as well as in jena bindings, it also
> >> > updates the rdf-commons dependency in rdf.core (to reduce potential
> >> > maven dependency conflicts).
> >> >
> >> > It contains the following artifacts that shall be released to maven
> >> > central:
> >> >
> >> > -rdf/jena/commons
> >> > -rdf/jena/facade
> >> > -rdf/jena/parser
> >> > -rdf/jena/serializer
> >> > -rdf/jena/sparql
> >> > -rdf/jena/storage
> >> > -rdf/jena/tdb.storage
> >> > -rdf/core
> >> > -rdf/stable.serializer
> >> > -provisioning/rdf
> >> > -provisioning/rdf.tdb
> >> > -provisioning/platform.content
> >> > -provisioning/launchers/content-launcher
> >> > -provisioning/launchers/linked-data-launcher
> >> >
> >> > It also contains the integration tests at:
> >> >
> >> > - provisioning/launchers/tests
> >> >
> >> > that can be used to verify that the build is working but that are not
> to
> >> > be releases to maven central (see notes below).
> >> >
> >> > Staging repo is here:
> >> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheclerezza-1012
> >> >
> >> > The source release is here:
> >> > http://home.apache.org/~reto/clerezza-release-201604/201604-1-src.zip
> >> >
> >> > The signature is here:
> >> >
> http://home.apache.org/~reto/clerezza-release-201604/201604-1-src.zip.asc
> >> >
> >> > MD5 (201604-1-src.zip) = 57a2d72f836a592bbdb86feda7755ddd
> >> >
> >> > The keys are here:
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/clerezza/KEYS
> >> >
> >> > The GIT tag is:
> >> > 201604
> >> >
> >> > Note on building:
> >> >
> >> > - unzip 201604-1-src.zip
> >> > - cd clerezza/releases/201604/
> >> > - mvn install
> >> >
> >> > The source zip also contains tests which unfortunately could not be
> >> > released because they depend on
> >> > org.apache.stanbol.commons.testing.jarexec 1.0.0 which has not yet
> been
> >> > released. Because of this running the tests requires some manual
> steps:
> >> >
> >> > - cd ../../provisioning/launchers/tests/content-launcher-tests
> >> > - remove "-SNAPSHOT" from all clerezza dependencies in pom.xml
> >> > - mvn test
> >> >
> >> > The vote is open for at least 48 hours.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Reto
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Stian Soiland-Reyes
> >> Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
> >> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>
>
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes
> Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>

Reply via email to