Hi Hasan

Before the release I would suggest to unify our two git repositories first as 
this separation seems quite arbitrary and confusing.

Cheers,
Reto

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hasan [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 7:37 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release rdf-core 0.3
> 
> Hi Reto,
> 
> what do you think of releasing rdf-core 0.3
> 
> cheers
> hasan
> 
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Hasan <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I kindly request active PMC members to show up and comment.
> >
> > regards
> > hasan
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 2:41 PM, ajs6f <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Do we have enough active PMC members left to hold a release vote?
> >>
> >> ajs6f
> >>
> >> > On Nov 14, 2017, at 2:35 AM, Hasan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > By checking the diff I would say, the public API remains unchanged.
> >> Perhaps Reto can confirm this.
> >> >
> >> > hasan
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:45 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > I think this is a good idea, if for no other reason than exercising
> >> > the
> >> release machinery-- it tends to get rusty if not used. Presumably,
> >> this will have a ripple effect up the (large) collection of Clerezza
> >> modules? Or is the public API unchanged?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ajs6f
> >> >
> >> > A. Soroka wrote on 11/13/17 1:34 PM:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Begin forwarded message:
> >> >
> >> > *From: *Hasan <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >> > *Subject: **[DISCUSS] Release rdf-core 0.3*
> >> > *Date: *November 13, 2017 at 8:22:19 AM EST
> >> > *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> > *Reply-To: *[email protected]
> >> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Dear all,
> >> >
> >> > What do you think if we release current 0.3-snapshot of rdf-core?
> >> > Version 0.2 was released in Nov. 2015 and there are some changes
> >> > made
> >> since
> >> > then.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for feedback.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers
> >> > Hasan
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >

Reply via email to