[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLK-631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839649#action_12839649
]
Andrei Ionescu commented on CLK-631:
------------------------------------
> @Andre: care to elaborate on why ClickClick is too complex?
The main reason for using Click is that it's among the few frameworks I DO
understand how it works (not really :) - but at least at a degree
to feel comfortable with it) - maybe I'm just not smart enough for the rest :(.
I took several looks over ClickClick and it just doesn't feels like Click -
it's not that simple and predictable, like there's too much abstraction where's
no need..., I don't know.
> The basic idea of CC is to use Ajax enabled controls so you don't have to
> write Ajax code yourself.
True, but it looks like too much - it feels too much like Wicket :( - like
trying to "over-componentizate" .
Looking at Wicket-stuff, it looks like they're trying to make components out if
every single javascript bit and option (for the js frameworks approached there).
Maybe it's a good idea for ExtJS (since it's very component like everything
there), but for the rest more sleek JS frameworks, it's not, or at least it
does not feels like that.
A problem too is that the Javascript landscape is changing all the time and too
fast for any Java framework to catch up really with it, so mapping it 1 to 1 in
Java just doesn't feel right :(.
> Ajax-Select demo with jQuery instead of Prototype
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLK-631
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLK-631
> Project: Click
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: examples
> Reporter: Joseph Schmidt
>
> Please make the click-examples/ajax-select demo:
> http://avoka.com/click-examples/ajax/ajax-select.htm
> to use jQuery instead of Prototype, the same way it's done with the Accordion
> example:
> http://avoka.com/click-examples/ajax/ajax-accordion.htm
> jQuery seems to have a much more simple and short syntax and there seems to
> be way more books for jQuery than for Prototype, so for new users it would be
> easier to reuse a jQuery example than the actual Prototype one, and get
> started with Click.
> Thank you,
> Joseph.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
