[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLK-680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12878390#action_12878390
]
Andrei Ionescu commented on CLK-680:
------------------------------------
Yeah, please update if it's possible to be more realistic (not just two pages).
Also this benchmark:
http://code.google.com/p/perfbench/
looks very good (almost a complete app), and it compares many concurrent stacks
(except Click + Cayenne :( ).
Unfortunately just too users (e.g. like the majority of my team) decide upon a
stack based on such comparison results (see the blog posts for results), and
not based on how easy is to learn the stack or how productive the coding is or
how good can the stack prevent errors.
Because of this, the solution looks to be to have all possible bench results
that include Click( + Cayenne) too (and also published, so that users can find
them)
> [ClickBench] Extend/update with more options.
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLK-680
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLK-680
> Project: Click
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: George Stan
>
> Update/extend ClickBench with:
> 1. the latest stable versions of used frameworks.
> 2. SpringMVC for compare
> 3. Click + Freemarker for compare
> 4. publish the bench results? :).
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
