Hi George, Thanks for your reply. The part which might look complicated is only the configuration part. And that is because my implementation does not come with Click distribution, if so then we could also avoid the configuration part. Which means, we could start using it without any configuration. I hope someday this will get integrated into Click.
And I agree with you, if the xml is dead simple, then its easier to use the xml configuration. But if it starts to get more messy on xml, then I prefer annotations, because they are less error pron. However, I believe this is all about choice of individuals. I just thought to start doing something for click, and since I am not a commiter, so i did that on google code. And yes, I believe, I will start looking into issues on issue tracker soon, and will try to contribute there. I appreciate your response and giving your view. And I will appreciate more if you can come up with some good suggestion to make the annotations better and more helpful :) Regards, Jahid On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 2:19 PM, georgex <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Md. Jahid Shohel wrote: > > > > I have created annotations based configuration/usability for click. Using > > which you can replace click.xml based configurations. Please check if > you > > like it. Also, if there is something you feel is missing, please let me > > know > > (the the user group or direct mail me). The current version is 1.0-RC1. > > The > > details can be found on - > > > > * Project home page - > > http://code.google.com/p/doubleclick/ > > > > > > * Click annotation home page - > > http://code.google.com/p/doubleclick/wiki/clickannotation > > > Nice work. > > There looks to be something similar in work: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLK-661 > > Not trying to be picky, but reading the documentation and giving it a try, > this all looks to me a lot more complicated than a a few-liner, dead-simple > XML :( . > > Not sure how is everybody's workflow, but I just copy over click.xml form > examples at project start, modify it a little and ready after a few > seconds. > For rest of the following weeks or months of project work, I barely touch > that click.xml. > > thanks, > George. > p.s. as a noob, I can't let the feeling that the skilled developers are > trying to improve Click in places where's not much gain. There are so many > open issues that would really bring big leaps: see the Popular Issues from > JIRA http://tinyurl.com/37shjm4 > > -- > View this message in context: > http://click.1134972.n2.nabble.com/Click-annotation-tp5177040p5177175.html > Sent from the click-development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
