On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Bob Schellink <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 15/06/2010 06:01, Finn Bock wrote: > > > > In jira [1] and the development notes for 2.3 [2] there is outlined a > > desire for a default implementation of the ConfigService. I'm working > > on this and will welcome your comments when it is ready. Your Click > > annotations is an obvious candidate for subclassing the > > DefaultConfigService class instead of XmlConfigService. > > > I agree with this approach. The XmlConfigService methods is tightly coupled > to XML so exposing those > methods might lead to subclasses that have to deal with XML as well. With a > clean default > implementation we could expose more surface areas for wiring up the > configuration in different ways. > > Yeah this one is better one, and the way it should be. I would really love to work with this DefaultConfigService, if anyone is not working. Since I am not a committer, and I don't know how to assign a task to myself. Anyone got any idea? Because I do not want to work on something which is someone else is already working on. Kind regards > > Bob > > Regards, Jahid
