Looks up to date to me: https://www.ohloh.net/p/apache-click/commits
On 26/07/2010 17:45, Andrei Ionescu wrote: >>> Lot's of users when compare Click to other projects, point out as a >>> "disadvantage" of Click the data from Ohloh.net. >>> I haven't used that before, and I'm not sure why it's the "authority" in >>> the open source scene, but those statistics there for Click look quite >>> outdated (e.g. last commit is from January) and make Click look less >>> valuable than it is. >> It looks like even as non-manager of the project there, I was allowed to >> change important data of the project (including the new SVN url to fetch >> the actual commits) > It looks like the stats about commits are still the old (last checkin > in January 2010). > This might be due to the fact that Bob changed the SVN URL from: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/click/trunk/ > to > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/click/trunk/click/ > > during the "parsing" procedure that took several hours. > (it's mentioned in their docs that if URLs are changed during > processing, their script will intercept, and fallback or do something > else unexpected) > > regards, > Andrei. > >
