Hey Folks, I think this sounds like a good plan. I would like to also suggest a plan of what needs to be accomplished to call 0.5 done. Trying to nail down the direction for v0.5 based on delivered functionality.
I humbly suggest migrating all of the 'rcmet' metrics over into ocw as a good goal for v0.5. Best Regards, Cameron On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Michael Joyce <[email protected]> wrote: > I envision mid to late-ish June. At the minimum CLIMATE-342 will need to be > resolved first as well. > > Thoughts? > > > -- Joyce > > > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > Any ideas about establishing a roadmap? > > There are some 108 issues marked for 0.4... this is a very large number > of > > issues for a project not long out of the incubator. > > Possible to set a realistic time frame? > > Thanks > > Lewis > > > > -- > > *Lewis* > > > -- Sent from a Tin Can attached to a String
