Looks like a plan. Thanks.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jinwon Kim
Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering and Dept. 
Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences
University of California, Los Angeles
607 Charles E Young Drive East, Young Hall, Room 4242, Los Angeles, CA 
90095-7228, USA
[email protected]; 310-206-2828
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Michael Joyce 
[[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 4:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OCW1.0

Hi Jinwon,

Thanks for bringing this up. I've been meaning to send an email to the list
for some while now regarding a change to our versioning scheme and to start
a discussion about a release roadmap.

I would like to see the project switch over to a more useful versioning
scheme such as [1]. I think we've reached a point in the project where we
can jump to a major version # increment without worrying about very
frequent API breaking changes. I would like to see 0.5 become 1.0.0 and
then move on from there. This would also let us make small changes/releases
without necessarily confusing everyone on the compatibility of the releases.

Thoughts on this everyone?

[1] http://semver.org/


-- Joyce


On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Kim, Jinwon <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Looks like you've made good progress in OCW 0.4. Is this a good time to
> think about releasing OCW version 1.0 to users and developers? This will
> also allow us to replace old RCMES versions that have been used by earlier
> users but are not supported anymore.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Jinwon Kim
> Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering and
> Dept. Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences
> University of California, Los Angeles
> 607 Charles E Young Drive East, Young Hall, Room 4242, Los Angeles, CA
> 90095-7228, USA
> [email protected]; 310-206-2828

Reply via email to