I'm mostly +0 on this. I don't mind a restructuring but I don't think it's terribly critical either. However, if someone wants to take a stab at rearranging some folders I'm fine with it.
-- Joyce On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Loikith, Paul C (329C-Caltech) < [email protected]> wrote: > Kim, this sounds like a good suggestion. We should talk more and flush > out details when we meet next week. > > Paul > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID > > > "Whitehall, Kim D (398J)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey guys, > as we prep for our next release, I was thinking about the file structure > of the distribution. It is my feeling that as it stands the file structure > doesn’t clearly delineate that OCW is a library that can perform various > manipulations and analysis of earth science datasets. In the same way there > is an examples folder, I am thinking that it may be useful to have an > applications folder (or something similar) for ocw-ui, ocw-cli, ocw-ui and > mccsearch folders can be moved as they are all applications utilizing the > OCW libs, as opposed to keeping them as separate folders in the main > distribution. > any thoughts? > > ************************************************************************** > Kim Whitehall, Ph.D. > Scientific Applications Software Engineer II > Computer Science for Data Intensive Applications Group (398M) > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, > 4800 Oak Grove Drive, > Pasadena, CA 91109, USA > Mailstop: 158 - 252D > Phone: (+1) (818) 354-5162 > Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > > >
