Cam, Do you have some specifics that we can throw into a JIRA ticket for those problems? NetCDF4 installs through conda so it should be rather painless. Re. dateutils, I thought that was included in Matplotlib (if I'm thinking of the same imports that you're talking about). I seem to have it installed in my conda environment. Perhaps at some point we missed updating the dependencies? Or maybe the recipe changed at some point and that is no longer being installed.
It looks like I have the following installed: | -> conda list | grep date dateutil 2.1 py27_2 python-dateutil 1.5 <pip> Thanks for checking guys! I'm +1 to release as well. Forgot to include that in the OP. -- Joyce On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mike, > Excellent effort in getting this out so quickly. > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:35 AM, <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > The tag for this release is available at: > > http://s.apache.org/JTzz > > > > Tag looks fantastic, I am never surprised at how much work this small > community fo develoeprs does. > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=climate.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.txt;hb=5b25b729c323df5ad9fcbf254e5c0f1463ac200a > WOW > > DOAP is missing the new proposed 0.5 release > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=climate.git;a=blob_plain;f=doap_CLIMATE.rdf;hb=5b25b729c323df5ad9fcbf254e5c0f1463ac200a > By no means a blocker in any way shape or form > I updated the release procedure with this info > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLIMATE/Software+Release+Process#SoftwareReleaseProcess-UpdatePreviousReleasewithintheDOAPfileinmaster > > All license files and NOTICE looks good. I really like the addition of the > guidance for building documentation. Make s a huge difference. > Documentation builds fine and looks great. > > > > > > > > Release artifacts are available for review at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/climate/0.5_rc1/ > > > > Based on the guidance on checking sigs from our Downloads page > http://climate.apache.org/downloads.html > I see the following > > lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Desktop/climate $ gpg --import KEYS > gpg: key 58EBE86D: "Cameron Goodale (FOR CODE SIGNING) <[email protected] > >" > not changed > gpg: key 2C47D568: "Paul Michael Ramirez (CODE SIGNING KEY) < > [email protected]>" not changed > gpg: key 97E49CC0: "Michael Joyce (ASF Code Signing Key) <[email protected] > >" > not changed > gpg: Total number processed: 3 > gpg: unchanged: 3 > lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Desktop/climate $ gpg --verify climate-0.5.tgz.asc > KEYS climate-0.5_rc1.tgz.md5 climate-0.5_rc1.zip.md5 > climate-0.5_rc1.tgz climate-0.5_rc1.zip > climate-0.5_rc1.tgz.asc climate-0.5_rc1.zip.asc > lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Desktop/climate $ gpg --verify > climate-0.5_rc1.tgz.asc > gpg: Signature made Fri Dec 5 11:39:46 2014 PST using RSA key ID 97E49CC0 > gpg: Good signature from "Michael Joyce (ASF Code Signing Key) < > [email protected]>" > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the > owner. > Primary key fingerprint: E910 C12D 9A7C 14CC ACCE D243 CB78 9D49 97E4 9CC0 > lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Desktop/climate $ gpg --verify > climate-0.5_rc1.zip.asc > gpg: Signature made Fri Dec 5 11:39:49 2014 PST using RSA key ID 97E49CC0 > gpg: Good signature from "Michael Joyce (ASF Code Signing Key) < > [email protected]>" > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the > owner. > Primary key fingerprint: E910 C12D 9A7C 14CC ACCE D243 CB78 9D49 97E4 9CC0 > lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Desktop/climate $ md5sum climate-0.5_rc1.tgz > bash: md5sum: command not found > lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Desktop/climate $ md5 climate-0.5_rc1.tgz > MD5 (climate-0.5_rc1.tgz) = 8f81cc7079d082bb52cafc12f7efd533 > lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Desktop/climate $ md5 climate-0.5_rc1.zip > MD5 (climate-0.5_rc1.zip) = dedade62a974e13b20c0343b18cbf682 > > All good. > > Extracted tar.gz on Ubuntu VM, installed via easy-ocw/ubuntu script. > Ran example's, all good. > > > > > Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OCW 0.5. The vote is > > open for the next 72 hours > > > > > > [X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OCW 0.5 > This appears to be a good solid release. Fantastic job to a number of > folks. Porting of metrics amongst other endeavors has certainly been the > drive and body of this development drive. > > Thank you > Lewis >
