Github user huikyole commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/climate/pull/220#discussion_r36379129
--- Diff: ocw-cli/cli_app.py ---
@@ -1232,11 +1180,11 @@ def settings_screen(header):
if option == '4':
screen.addstr(25, x/2, "Enter Spatial Gridding Option
[Model, Observation or User]:")
new_spatial_grid_option = screen.getstr()
- if new_spatial_grid_option.lower() == 'model':
- spatial_grid_option = 'Model'
- spatial_grid_setting = model_lat_res
- note = "Spatial gridding option has changed
successfully to {0}".format(spatial_grid_option)
- elif new_spatial_grid_option.lower() == 'observation':
+ #if new_spatial_grid_option.lower() == 'model':
--- End diff --
@MJJoyce
Regarding the first one: Actually this is the main reason for removing the
option from CLI. Sorry for the confusion. We used to provide the regridding on
model grid points is because we have used only regridded model datasets. So
whichever model we choose, their resolution and grid points are always the
same. When climate scientists evaluating multiple models with different
resolution, they do not regrid observation data and the other model data into
grid points of one model. It is always regridding into observation data's grid
points or into user specified grid points.
Regarding the second one:
This is an issue of our regridding scheme rather than a reason for changing
CLI code. Once we address prioritized issues, I will open a ticket on this
problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
