Hi Kyo, On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:49 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> > -1 Do not release the package because there are many important pull > requests under pending now. > I just wonder if there are any reasons to expedite the release. > > Thanks, > Kyo > > Thanks for taking the time to VOTE. I would urge you to rethink your VOTE based upon the following. This VOTE is based upon releasing the OCW 1.0.0 codebase as of September 3rd, 2015. The pull requests which you refer to are independent from the 1.0.0 #1 release candidate as posted on 3rd September, 2015. Baring in mind that 20 days a quite a long time and I am not surprised that new code contributions have arrived during that window. Unless any of these subsequent issues which are now pending as commits to the OCW codebase are "Blocking" or "Critical" in nature e.g. a critical bug which has been introduced which renders the codebase unusable, then I am very reluctant to see that as valid justification to block the release of a functioning codebase packaged into the 1.0.0 release as presented by the 1.0.0 RC#1 as posted above. Does this make sense? Would you consider changing your VOTE based on the above with us provisionally agreeing to release OCQ 1.0.1 or 1.1 in a shorter time window? Would be really nice to meet some consensus here Kyo. Thanks Lewis
