Since the plots didn't attach in the last message, here they are: https://i.imgur.com/mAuq0R5.png https://i.imgur.com/TeRYSPI.png
Thanks, Alex -----Original Message----- From: Goodman, Alexander (US 398K) <alexander.good...@jpl.nasa.gov.INVALID> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 8:05 AM To: dev@climate.apache.org Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Retire OCW? Hi Michael, Please see this overview slide: https://i.imgur.com/VnijQ5C.png Here is also a link of some older slides which have a lot more details: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1nhD3_fZmVcmBnq9NiMBYeDMsxr5kIimI7dE9NNUQJEM/edit?usp=sharing I also created an end-to-end processing benchmark that I compared with the current OCW, which I have attached in two plots: One with regridding and one without, since the difference is so vast. I first presented these results at the AMS Annual meeting last year in Phoenix. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Alex -----Original Message----- From: Michael Anderson <michael.arthur.ander...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 5:59 PM To: dev@climate.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Retire OCW? Do you have an overview of the new library you could share? It'd be interesting how big the gap between the old and new would be / rough LOE to add parity. On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 7:35 PM Alex Goodman <good...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Lewis, > > To add some more specifics, the new xarray-based API I have developed > for OCW called BCDP (Big Climate Data Pipeline) has recently been > approved for release to open source. Keep in mind, this is a > completely new API that is not backwards compatible, so we were > planning to maintain both the old and new API under one repository > (either as separate subfolders or git > branches) until the new API has enough functionality to fully replace > the old one. To accelerate this process and encourage more > development, both Kyo and I are seeking some additional funding > sources which we should be more certain about early next year. When I > first conceived BCDP, I was originally planning on releasing it to > open source as a separate project outside of OCW, but after some > discussion we thought that it would be better to maintain the OCW brand for > it if possible. > > Does this make sense? > > Thanks, > Alex > On 2019/11/20 00:17:22, lewis john mcgibbney <lewi...@apache.org> wrote: > > I got this from Kyo offline > > > > “There is enough motivation to keep OCW going. Alex has almost > > refactored OCW and Seungwon Lee's CMDA will be a part of OCW.” > > > > Some of us will remember that CMDA was retired from the Apache > > Incubator previously. > > > > It would be great if these plans could be hashed out on the mailing > > list > so > > we can move forward either way. > > > > Lewis > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 09:32 Lewis John Mcgibbney < > > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Folks, > > > Project activity is very low and new contributions are not being > reviewed. > > > Simply, is it time to retire OCW to the Apache Attic? > > > Best > > > Lewis > > > > > > -- > > > > > > *Lewis* > > > Dr. Lewis J. McGibbney Ph.D, B.Sc > > > *Skype*: lewis.john.mcgibbney > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/ > > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc > > >
