Thanks Mazi!!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++






-----Original Message-----
From: <Boustani>, "Maziyar   (398F)" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 11:12 AM
To: "<[email protected]>" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Different (better) RCMES structure

>Hey Chris,
>
>Done.
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLIMATE/RCMES+flowchart
>
>Best,
>Mazi
>
>On Jun 4, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) wrote:
>
>> Mazi this is great. One request I have is can you post the below
>> RCMES flow chart to the Climate wiki here?
>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLIMATE/Index
>> 
>> 
>> I'll comment on the below shortly.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>> 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Senior Computer Scientist
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> Email: [email protected]
>> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: <Boustani>, "Maziyar   (398F)" <[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: "[email protected]"
>> <[email protected]>
>> Date: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 9:37 AM
>> To: "[email protected]"
>><[email protected]>
>> Subject: Different (better) RCMES structure
>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> 
>>> Here is the different RCMES structure after I went through all codes
>>>and
>>> created a flowchart:
>>> https://oodt.jpl.nasa.gov/wiki/display/RCMES/RCMES+FlowChart
>>> The setting below can set to RCMES by the new menu-based command line
>>> interface or by a config file.
>>> 
>>> REQUIRED
>>> =========
>>> The items below are mandatory for user to input for any evaluation:
>>> 
>>> 1- model file
>>> 2- observation (parameter ID)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> NECESSARY
>>> ==========
>>> The items below can be set to their default values without asking from
>>> user. Default values can be set after model and observation have given
>>> from user.
>>> These values can be modified if user want to change the value of them
>>> before running evaluation.
>>> 
>>> 1- spatial resolution (minLat, maxLat, minLon, maxLon)
>>> 2- temporal resolution (start time, end time)
>>> 3- spatial and temporal grid option
>>> 4- model variables (latitude, longitude, time and value name) [these
>>> variable should be identified automatically]
>>> 5- metrics (can be set to one or some of available metrics as default)
>>> 6- subregion (subregion can be set to None, but user can modify before
>>> running the evaluation)
>>> 7- work and cache directory (can be set to rcmet/work and rcmet/cache
>>>by
>>> default)
>>> 8- any plotting settings
>>> 
>>> 
>>> NOT REQUIRED
>>> =============
>>> The items below are not required anymore.
>>> 
>>> 1- grid latitude resolution (a new column will be added to parameter
>>> table in DB to contain this value)
>>> 2- grid longitude resolution (a new column will be added to parameter
>>> table in DB to contain this value)
>>> 3- output format (this always would be netCDF file, therefore there is
>>>no
>>> need to ask the user what format he/she need)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The strategic above will ask user less questions and most of current
>>> RCMES questions will be answered by gathering the model's and
>>> observation's information.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please share with me your thoughts and ideas.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Mazi
>>> 
>> 
>

Reply via email to