[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Huikyo Lee updated CLIMATE-88:
------------------------------
Attachment: benchmark_metrics.py
Way to go! Anyway, I also tested your benchmark code using dataset.resize and
found no difference.
Can we consider using method 'resize'? At least, it is easier for me to
understand the code.
Please see the enclosed
Kyo
> Performance improvements for metrics.py
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLIMATE-88
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-88
> Project: Apache Open Climate Workbench
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: metrics
> Affects Versions: 0.1-incubating
> Reporter: Alex Goodman
> Assignee: Chris A. Mattmann
> Fix For: 0.1-incubating
>
> Attachments: benchmark_metrics.py, benchmark_metrics.py,
> benchmark_metrics.py
>
>
> The performance for many of the functions in metrics.py can be improved by
> removing some unnecessary loops and utilizing shape manipulation.
> I have attached some example code that benchmarks the differences between the
> original and proposed methodology if you did not see it in the mailing list.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
