Chris, I'd be happy to be RM for this release. I will get started on tomorrow.
Prost, Cam On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) < [email protected]> wrote: > Let's do it! > > Cam you want to be the RM? I nominate you :) > > +1 for Cam. > > Cheers, > Chris > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: [email protected] > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Joyce <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:14 AM > To: dev <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: DISCUSS - Cut a 0.1 Release of the Code > > >Sounds good to me! > > > > > >-- Joyce > > > > > >On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Cameron Goodale <[email protected]> > >wrote: > > > >> Hey Team, > >> > >> There has been a lot of talk about making some far reaching changes to > >>the > >> code, from changing required modules to completely refactoring the core > >> functionality into a more maintainable format. > >> > >> I agree that the code will benefit from all of these > >>changes/improvements, > >> but before we set out on this adventure I think it would be a good idea > >>to > >> release the current and stable version of the code as v0.1. This way > >> people can use 0.1 knowing it works, while we continue development in > >>the > >> trunk. > >> > >> Please discuss. > >> > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> > >> > >> > >> Cameron > >> > >
