+1 to removing them from the list, but documenting them as a TODO
in the code, or on the wiki.

Cheers,
Chris

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++






-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Goodale <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Date: Friday, June 28, 2013 12:16 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: DISCUSS - Limit the Metric Selection options

>Hey Folks,
>
>While running through testing of the rcmet.py code that asks all the
>Question & Answers at the command line a user is presented with the
>following list of Metric Options:
>
>Metric options
>> [0] Bias: mean bias across full time range
>> [1] Mean Absolute Error: across full time range
>> [2] Spatial Pattern Correlation: results in a time series of spatial
>> correlation coeff
>> [3] Temporal Correlation: results in 2-d array of temporal correlation
>> coefficient
>> [4] Spatial Pattern Correlation between averaged fields: results in a
>> single correlation coeff
>> [5] RMSE in time: results in a 2-d array of RMSE over two time series
>> [6] TODO: Probability Distribution Function similarity score
>> Please make a selection from the options above
>
>
>Options 2 & 4 from the list do not work.
>
>So I would like to hear from the community is we should either repair
>these
>two options, or just remove them from the list, or some other option.
>
>If you want to repeat what I am seeing, just grab a copy of the trunk (
>apply Kyo and Alex's Patch to metrics.py if not applied yet) and run:
>
>$  python rcmet.py
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>-Cameron

Reply via email to