On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 at 13:54, Dianjin Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Kirill, > > Thanks for taking a close look at the SonarQube reports and for > raising these points. > > As far as I understand, there hasn’t been any dedicated effort yet to > triage or address the reported issues. > > I agree with your observations and suggestions: > > * Excluding regression SQL files from SonarQube analysis makes sense, > as they are test artifacts and not production code. > * Adjusting the code duplication threshold also seems reasonable, > since the current default threshold appears too strict for our > codebase and may not accurately reflect real maintainability concerns.
Thank you for your response. > I'm not sure if you have been the admin team for SonarQube. If not, let me > know. Looks like I am not an admin for SonarQube... > Best, > Dianjin Wang > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
