On 21/03/13 3:10 AM, "Manan Shah" <manan.s...@citrix.com> wrote:
>Thanks Murali for the FS. Below are some questions/comments. > >1. Is there a reason why we wouldn't support this feature for VPC? Manan, thanks for reviewing. There is no particular reason, VPC would need little different semantics we need to think through. Its just that I do not have bandwidth to get the support in VPC as well for 4.2. I would rather get the EIP support in 'advanced zone' and across regions baked up properly for 4.2. >2. Your FS talks about supporting EIP for Shared Networks as well. Are you >going to support that? If so, are you going to support it only when NS is >enabled as a LB service provider? Yes, We already support NetScaler as EIP & ELB service provider in basic zone 'shared network'. So I would imagine this would be easy extension. >3. On Stopping a VM in basic zone today, CS does not detach the EIP from >the VM. I believe the functionality should be consistent with the current >support as well as consistent across Basic and Advanced Zones >4. In Advanced Zone Network with EIP service, I am assuming you will not >allocate a Public IP for every guest VM. Your FS talks about Advanced Zone >behaving exactly like Basic Zone. That's why I am asking. >5. Currently, we support EIP in Basic Zone. For basic zone users, it might >get confusing that there are two ways to do EIP in Basic Zone. Ok, I missed this point. I will keep the backward compatibility and keep the semantics of EIP in advanced zone same with basic zone. I will update the spec to reflect this. Thanks, Murali
