On 28-Mar-2013, at 7:20 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 01:44:30PM +0000, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: >> I think both the branches are important, yes 4.1 is close to release and >> people assigned issues should give priority to 4.1. >> There are also many people trying to test there features in master and >> unstable master is resulting in wasted cycles. >> >> Having said that I guess people having issues assigned in both the >> branches should focus on 4.1 issues first before moving to 4.2 bugs. > > Yes, and it seems to me that discussions around prioritization of bugs > in master should be threaded by *feature* primarily (excepting general > blockers that *break* the build/tests). > Sure, will prioritise the master bugs only if they block some feature development or in general break the build/test.
