This depends on the changes proposed in the ACL deny rules feature. Can you re-word taking into account the new proposed APIs?
On 3/28/13 12:46 AM, "Abhinandan Prateek" <[email protected]> wrote: >+1, thanks for proposing and working on this feature. > >On 28/03/13 11:32 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" ><[email protected]> wrote: > >>I would like to propose the new feature ACL on private gateway. >>This feature is sub feature of the nTier 2.0 apps. >> >>Currently we do not have way to control the traffic on the private >>gateway. >>Using this feature we can configure the ingress/egress ACL on the private >>gateway. >> >> >>Jira Id: >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-768 >> >>FS: >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/ACLs+on+private+GW >> >>Please provide your comments on the above FS. >> >>Thanks, >>Jayapal >> >
