----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10725/#review19579 -----------------------------------------------------------
server/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10725/#comment40435> Would restore vm increment these limits again ? server/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10725/#comment40436> What about the resource limit for the vm ? where is that getting decremented. Are these consistent ? - Nitin Mehta On April 23, 2013, 8:42 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10725/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 23, 2013, 8:42 a.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, Sateesh Chodapuneedi, and Min > Chen. > > > Description > ------- > > CLOUDSTACK-2087: Destroying the instance is not decrementing the primary > storage usage [Resource Count table - No of volumes is not got decremented] > > > This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-2087. > > > Diffs > ----- > > server/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java c1f3f15 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10725/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Tests: > 1. Deploy an instance from a user account. > 2. Check the updated resource count (primary storage and volume). > 3. Destroy the same instance. > 4. Verify the decremented resource count from the account detailView. > > > Thanks, > > Sanjay Tripathi > >
