Should we use the Ubuntu package for now? On 5/9/13 2:03 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sh...@yasker.org> wrote:
>HAproxy is missing in Debian 7.0's repo, due to old maintainer is missing. > >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674447 >http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2013/04/msg00039.html > >The new maintainer took over it at Apr 20th, but there is no schedule of >recovering yet. > >That's why depends on everyday generated systemvm template is dangerous. > >--Sheng > > >On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Rohit Yadav <bhais...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Abhinandan Prateek < >> agneya2...@hotmail.com >> > wrote: >> >> > The haproxy and port map services are not installed on VMWare system >>VM >> > template. Is the path used to create the templates different for >> different >> > Hypervisor templates ? I was under the assumption that the services >> > installed on all the system VM templates meant for different >>hypervisors >> > should be same ? >> > >> >> No? Pl. see tools/appliance/systemvmtemplate/postinstall.sh, if it's >>there >> those pkgs will be installed. >> For the template I created, I had built it with veewee on my system and >> then imported it in vmware fusion to install the vmware-tools. >> >> Cheers. >> >> >> > >> > -abhi >> > >>
