Anthony, do we even support Advance zone with SG in 4.1? I thought you've checked it in in 4.2 only. If this is true, then:
* no upgrade support for SG enabled setups to 4.1 should be provided * 4.1 UI shouldn't let you create Advance zone with SG enabled. If UI for SG enabled Advance zone was somehow merged to 4.1 branch, it should be reverted as there is no backend/db upgrade support exist there. -Alena. On 5/13/13 1:10 PM, "Paul Angus" <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> wrote: >Done. :) > >Regards, > >Paul Angus >S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 >paul.an...@shapeblue.com > >-----Original Message----- >From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com] >Sent: 13 May 2013 18:38 >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to >4.1.0 failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced >network with security groups) > >Thanks, Paul. > >Could you login to the database and paste the result of the commands >Nicolas listed in Description? > > >2013/5/13 Paul Angus (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> > >> >> [ >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2463?page=com.atlassi >> an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId >> =13656100#comment-13656100] >> >> Paul Angus commented on CLOUDSTACK-2463: >> ---------------------------------------- >> >> On a clean build of ACS4.1-SNAPSHOT from 13/05/13 I created an >> advanced zone with security groups. >> >> When attempting to enable the zone I received the following message: >> >> 'Cannot enable this Zone since: Unable to find the default physical >> network with traffic=Public in the specified zone id' >> >> As it was an advanced zone with security groups I didn't get the >> option to add/configure a public network. >> >> > CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to no public network found >> (configuration : advanced network with security groups) >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > Key: CLOUDSTACK-2463 >> > URL: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2463 >> > Project: CloudStack >> > Issue Type: Bug >> > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the >> default.) >> > Affects Versions: 4.1.0 >> > Reporter: Nicolas Lamirault >> > Assignee: Wei Zhou >> > Priority: Blocker >> > Fix For: 4.1.0 >> > >> > >> > According Wei Zhou last patch ( >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-528), i can add a new >> secondary storage. The SSVM creation failed due to : >> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,868 DEBUG >> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) >> Zone 1 is ready to launch secondary storage VM >> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,879 INFO >> [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] >> (secstorage-1:null) No running secondary storage vms found in >> datacenter id=1, starting one >> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,889 INFO >> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) No >> stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new >> secondary storage vm >> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,894 DEBUG >> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) >> Assign secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request >> from data center : 1 >> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,922 WARN [cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner] >> (secstorage-1:null) Unexpected exception Found 22 networks of type >> Guest when expect to find 1 >> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Found 22 networks >> > of >> type Guest when expect to find 1 >> > at >> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.createSecStora >> geVmInstance(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:552) >> > at >> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startNew(Secon >> daryStorageManagerImpl.java:499) >> > at >> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity( >> SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:666) >> > at >> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Sec >> ondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1300) >> > at >> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Premi >> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121) >> > at >> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Premi >> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52) >> > at >> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:104 >> ) >> > at >> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:3 >> 3) >> > at >> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java: >> 81) >> > at >> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72) >> > at >> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441 >> ) >> > at >> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java: >> 317) >> > at >> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150) >> > at >> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.a >> ccess$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98) >> > at >> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.r >> unPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) >> > at >> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.r >> un(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204) >> > at >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecu >> tor.java:886) >> > at >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor. >> java:908) >> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) >> > We try this patch : >> > diff --git >> a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.j >> ava >> b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.j >> ava >> > index fca89dc..d40d22f 100755 >> > --- >> a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.j >> ava >> > +++ >> b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.j >> ava >> > @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ public class SecondaryStorageManagerImpl extends >> ManagerBase implements Secondar >> > DataCenter dc = _dcDao.findById(plan.getDataCenterId()); >> > TrafficType defaultTrafficType = TrafficType.Public; >> > - if (dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic || >> dc.isSecurityGroupEnabled()) { >> > + if (dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic) { >> > defaultTrafficType = TrafficType.Guest; >> > } >> > @@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ public class SecondaryStorageManagerImpl >> > extends >> ManagerBase implements Secondar >> > List<NicProfile> nics = profile.getNics(); >> > for (NicProfile nic : nics) { >> > if ((nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Public && >> dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Advanced) >> > - || (nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest && >> > (dc.getNetworkType() >> == NetworkType.Basic || dc.isSecurityGroupEnabled()))) { >> > + || (nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest && >> > + || (dc.getNetworkType() >> == NetworkType.Basic))) { >> > secVm.setPublicIpAddress(nic.getIp4Address()); >> > secVm.setPublicNetmask(nic.getNetmask()); >> > secVm.setPublicMacAddress(nic.getMacAddress()); >> > Then the error : >> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,084 INFO >> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) No >> stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new >> secondary storage vm >> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,090 DEBUG >> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) >> Assign secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request >> from data center : 1 >> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,126 WARN [cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner] >> (secstorage-1:null) Unexpected exception Found 0 networks of type >> Public when expect to find 1 >> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Found 0 networks of >> type Public when expect to find 1 >> > at >> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.createSecStora >> geVmInstance(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:555) >> > at >> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startNew(Secon >> daryStorageManagerImpl.java:499) >> > at >> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity( >> SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:669) >> > at >> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Sec >> ondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1304) >> > at >> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Premi >> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121) >> > at >> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Premi >> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52) >> > at >> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:104 >> ) >> > at >> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:3 >> 3) >> > at >> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java: >> 81) >> > at >> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72) >> > at >> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441 >> ) >> > at >> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java: >> 317) >> > at >> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150) >> > at >> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.a >> ccess$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98) >> > at >> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.r >> unPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) >> > at >> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.r >> un(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204) >> > at >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecu >> tor.java:886) >> > at >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor. >> java:908) >> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) >> > Into database : >> > select distinct(traffic_type) from networks where data_center_id = 1 >> > and >> state <> 'DESTROY'; >> > +--------------+ >> > | traffic_type | >> > +--------------+ >> > | Management | >> > | Control | >> > | Storage | >> > | Guest | >> > +--------------+ >> > select count(*) as nb, traffic_type from networks where >> > data_center_id >> = 1 group by traffic_type; >> > +----+--------------+ >> > | nb | traffic_type | >> > +----+--------------+ >> > | 1 | Control | >> > | 25 | Guest | >> > | 1 | Management | >> > | 1 | Storage | >> > +----+--------------+ >> > In our CS 2.2.13, we've got this configuration : >> > select distinct(traffic_type) from networks where data_center_id = 1 >> > and >> state <> 'DESTROY'; >> > +--------------+ >> > | traffic_type | >> > +--------------+ >> > | Management | >> > | Control | >> > | Storage | >> > | Guest | >> > +--------------+ >> > select count(*) as nb, traffic_type from networks where >> > data_center_id = >> 1 group by traffic_type; >> > +-----+--------------+ >> > | nb | traffic_type | >> > +-----+--------------+ >> > | 1 | Control | >> > | 362 | Guest | >> > | 1 | Management | >> > | 1 | Storage | >> > +-----+--------------+ >> >> -- >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA >> administrators For more information on JIRA, see: >> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >> >This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended >solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views >or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not >necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If >you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take >any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please >contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. >Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue >Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. >ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. > >
