Thank you for the input Chiradeep.

On May 28, 2013, at 11:13 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> 
wrote:

> The test is invalid -- it is only testing one core.
> RPS steers the packet processing to a CPU core based on the hash of the
> TCP/UDP 4-tuple in the header (src addr, dest addr, src port dst port).
> With a single-stream test, the hash will send every packet to the same cpu
> 
> RFS is similarly based on the hash of the 4-tuple. The difference is that
> the packets are steered to the CPU of the application thread that is
> handling the flow.
> 
> Here's the guide on how to measure aggregate throughput:
> http://s.apache.org/EID
> 
> 
> On 5/24/13 3:52 AM, "Bharat Kumar" <bharat.ku...@citrix.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I have enabled the RPS and RFS support in the router vm and performed
>> some tests, but cloud not see any improvements.  If any one know about
>> RPS (receive packet steering ) and RFS (receive flow steering ) please
>> comment.  I am not sure if the RPS and RFS is working.
>> 
>> The router has 4 cores and 4GB of ram.
>> command used to enable rps
>> echo f > /sys/class/net/eth0/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
>> commands used to enable rfs
>> echo 1024 > /proc/sys/net/core/rps_sock_flow_entries
>> echo 1024 > /sys/class/net/eth0/queues/rx-0/rps_flow_c
>> 
>> kernel details
>> Linux  3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.35-2 i686 GNU/Linux
>> 
>> The following are the test results
>> Test Without rps
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> Testing with the following command line:
>> /usr/bin/netperf -l 60  -H 10.147.28.149 -c -C   -t TCP_RR -i 700,3 -I
>> 99,5 -- -r 1,1 -s 0 -S 0
>> 
>> TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to
>> 10.147.28.149 (10.147.28.149) port 0 AF_INET : +/-2.500% @ 99% conf.
>> Local /Remote
>> Socket Size   Request Resp.  Elapsed Trans.   CPU    CPU    S.dem   S.dem
>> Send   Recv   Size    Size   Time    Rate     local  remote local   remote
>> bytes  bytes  bytes   bytes  secs.   per sec  % S    % S    us/Tr   us/Tr
>> 
>> 2048   256    1       1      60.00   4280.98  16.30  4.06   38.081  37.977
>> 2048   2240
>> 
>> Test With RPS
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> usr/bin/netperf -l 60  -H 10.147.28.149 -c -C   -t TCP_RR -i 700,3 -I
>> 99,5 -- -r 1,1 -s 0 -S 0
>> TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to
>> 10.147.28.149 (10.147.28.149) port 0 AF_INET : +/-2.500% @ 99% conf.
>> Local /Remote
>> Socket Size   Request Resp.  Elapsed Trans.   CPU    CPU    S.dem   S.dem
>> Send   Recv   Size    Size   Time    Rate     local  remote local   remote
>> bytes  bytes  bytes   bytes  secs.   per sec  % S    % S    us/Tr   us/Tr
>> 
>> 2048   256    1       1      60.00   3926.40  14.47  3.68   37.093  37.561
>> 2048   2240
>> 
>> Test with RPS and RFS
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> /usr/bin/netperf -l 60  -H 10.147.28.149 -c -C   -t TCP_RR -i 700,3 -I
>> 99,5 -- -r 1,1 -s 0 -S 0
>> TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to
>> 10.147.28.149 (10.147.28.149) port 0 AF_INET : +/-2.500% @ 99% conf.
>> Local /Remote
>> Socket Size   Request Resp.  Elapsed Trans.   CPU    CPU    S.dem   S.dem
>> Send   Recv   Size    Size   Time    Rate     local  remote local   remote
>> bytes  bytes  bytes   bytes  secs.   per sec  % S    % S    us/Tr   us/Tr
>> 
>> 2048   256    1       1      60.00   3903.11  14.74  3.76   37.801  38.494
>> 2048   2240
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to