> -----Original Message----- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:36 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:02 AM, murali reddy > <muralimmre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We should do a health-check of proposed features [1] which are at risk > > for > > 4.2 feature freeze before deciding to re-evaluate timelines. > > > > We are supposedly doing time-based release, so we don't care about what > features make it versus don't.
4.1 was also supposed to be a time based one but got delayed due to various issues. So not sure what would be the right approach here. I think it makes sense to look at the feature list to see if some of them (individual features can be voted upon) can be accommodated in 4.2. If there are no such features then there is no need for extending the cutoff date. > > --David
