Ok - thanks for clarification! -----Original Message----- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 11:20 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS42] Ceph Storage Integration with Cloudstack -
On 06/12/2013 07:38 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Thanks Wido for the response. I have another question. Is there any impact > because of storage refactoring work that Edison and min have been doing?? > I don't think so. We could implement some new strategies for RBD with the new framework, but I haven't done that. The Object Store is something different, since that enables you to use the Amazon S3 compatible RADOS Gateway from Ceph as Secondary Storage (Backup and Template). Wido > -----Original Message----- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 10:23 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS42] Ceph Storage Integration with Cloudstack - > > Hi, > > I recently wrote a short blog post about this: > http://blog.widodh.nl/2013/06/a-quick-note-on-running-cloudstack-with- > rbd-on-ubuntu-12-04/ > > The RBD integration in CloudStack 4.2 (master branch) is ready for testing, > not everything has been verified by me, but it should work. > > Things that I'm not yet sure about: > * Expunging of RBD volumes > * Expunging of unused templates from Primary Storage > > It has all been integrated into the build process in master, so it should be > just a matter of setting up a cluster from the master branch, add Ceph > primary storage and see if it works. > > A second pair of eyes on the code is always welcome, since I probably forgot > something. > > Wido > > On 06/12/2013 03:36 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: >> Hi Wido, >> >> This is regarding Ceph integration validation related to the >> following tickets >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-574 >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1191 >> >> If someone want to validate Ceph integration with Cloudstack, what are the >> requirements and also is code ready for someone to validate?? >> >> Thanks >> /sudha >> >>
