> On June 30, 2013, 6:50 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > Applying: CLOUDSTACK-2288: NPE while creating volume from snapshot when the 
> > primary storage is in maintenance state.
> > error: patch failed: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java:523
> > error: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java: patch does not 
> > apply
> > Patch failed at 0001 CLOUDSTACK-2288: NPE while creating volume from 
> > snapshot when the primary storage is in maintenance state.
> > When you have resolved this problem run "git am --resolved".
> > If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git am --skip".
> > To restore the original branch and stop patching run "git am --abort".
> > 
> > Fails to apply because of storage related changes. Can you retest if this 
> > is still an issue and submit the patch?
> > 
> > Thanks

The issue is still there in master so recreating the patch based on latest 
master code.


- Sanjay


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11670/#review22579
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 6, 2013, 11:24 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11670/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 6, 2013, 11:24 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2288
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> CLOUDSTACK-2288: NPE while creating volume from snapshot when the primary 
> storage is in maintenance state.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java 43f3681 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11670/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tests:
> 1. In CS setup, put all primary storage in maintenance mode.
> 2. Create a volume from snapshot.
> 
> Verified the fix locally.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sanjay Tripathi
> 
>

Reply via email to