On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:07:47PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:05:44PM -0400, John Burwell wrote: > > Prasanna, > > > > I don't think a small namespace will deliver much value. We are > > responsible for maintaining the code base -- even the older code > > that will eventually be replaced. I would prefer to start with a > > smaller set of rules focused on high priority issues (e.g. lack of > > proper equals, hashCode, and toString implementations), fix them > > across the entire codebase, and then expand the rule set. Wash, > > rinse, repeat until we have a complete rule set and a compliant > > code base. > > > > Thanks, > > -John > > Same goal / different paths... FWIW, I'm with John. However, someone > needs to propose the initial set of rules. >
Works for me! -- Prasanna., ------------------------ Powered by BigRock.com
