It was tested pre-4.0 release. As mentioned earlier, there were no changes or reported issues in this area.
-----Original Message----- From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:11 PM To: [email protected]; 'Chip Childers'; Sudha Ponnaganti Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? Sudha was Swift working for 4.0 or 4.1? Edison couldn't we use S3 API for Swift? The support is probably not comprehensive [1][2] [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/APIFeatureComparison [2] http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-object-storage/admin/content/configuring-openstack-object-storage-with-s3_api.html > -----Original Message----- > From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 10:31 AM > To: [email protected]; 'Chip Childers' > Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported > in 4.2? > > Swift was tested for older version of Citrix release. There were no > code changes or certification requests, so that area was deprioritized. > > Thanks > /Sudha > > -----Original Message----- > From: Edison Su [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 10:15 AM > To: 'Chip Childers'; <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported > in 4.2? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 6:46 AM > > To: <[email protected]>; Edison Su > > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be > > supported > in 4.2? > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:22 AM, David Nalley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Edison Su <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> Due to object store refactor, Swift is broken. The reason, is > > >> that, we only > > have S3 test environment in our lab, so only S3 is tested for now. > > >> Before adding the feature back, I'd better ask from, the > > >> community, do > > we want to support Swift? If so, which version of Swift? This will > > take some efforts to support Swift, are there any volunteers can > > help > the integration? > > > > > > > > > Whats the bug ID for this? > > > Unplanned/Unannounced deprecation of a feature is a blocker IMO. > > > It engenders a bad relationship with our users, and strands them > > > on previous versions with no good migration/upgrade path. > > > > > > --David > > > > > > > Edison, How broken is it? Is it shorter to fix or revert the object > > store changes? > It's not working at all. Not sure, revert object store will change it > or not, as this feature is not tested by QA for a long time.
