Hi Wei, thanks for you answer.
About this issue, we do some tests and we think it is a bug. I will give
you more details about the tests:
We have CloudStack 4.19.1 KVM cluster
CS has two physical network interfaces configured in CloudStack as follows:
* *Physical Network 1 (cloudbr0)*: Handles all general CloudStack
traffic (VMs, Guest, Management, Public). This network has no tag.
* *Physical Network 2 (cloudbr1)*: Handles primary storage traffic in
CloudStack (NFS for qcow2 images). This network is tagged as “STO.”
All hosts have both network interfaces. What I want to do is create a
shared network to connect *Physical Network 2* to a virtual router so
that VMs associated with this virtual router can reach the network
behind *Physical Network 2*.
As shown in the video, when we try to add the shared network, the
offering corresponding to *Physical Network 2*, associated with the
"STO" tag, does not appear.
Video:
youtu.be
2025 02 03 17 44 08 <#>
🔗 https://youtu.be/o-NTlrbdCQE <https://youtu.be/o-NTlrbdCQE>
El 3/2/2025 a las 11:17, Wei ZHOU escribió:
Hi Mauro,
After some discussions, we tend to consider that it is not a bug.
If you have multiple physical networks with Guest traffic, it is
recommended to keep the default physical network untagged.
Kind regards,
Wei
On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 2:46 PM Mauro Ferraro - G2K Hosting <
mferr...@g2khosting.com> wrote:
Hi, how are you?.
We download de RC to test the
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9673 but we noted that is
not available yet. So, we want to wait this issue to test this specific
and complex situation.
Regards,
El 3/2/2025 a las 06:26, Daan Hoogland escribió:
LS,
I've had no reactions. I can say "no news is good news" or be a
pessimist.
Did anybody at all have a look yet? The 72 hours are way gone, and we
had a
weekend as well.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:52 AM Daan Hoogland<d...@apache.org> wrote:
LS,
I uploaded convenience packages to
https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.2.0-RC20250128T0916/ for
those interested.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 9:28 AM Daan Hoogland<d...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.19.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.2.0-RC20250128T0916Commit:
5c6b04f6bfcca575492e97f32a6d1d23b49bdffc
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.19.2.0/
PGP release keys (signed using
256ABDFB8D89EDE07540BE6ACEF9E802B86FEED4):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
I am in the process of creating convenience packages and will update on
those in this mail-thread.
regards,
