+1 (Binding).
Tested the 0.7 rc1 provider and it works fine Deployed vm instance, network , lb rules Regards Kiran On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 11:18 AM Suresh Kumar Anaparti < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Just a quick reminder on the vote for the CloudStack Terraform Provider > release candidate (RC1) for version 0.7.0. > > If you haven't had a chance yet, please test and cast your vote. Thanks! > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > Regards, > Suresh > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 3:11 PM Suresh Kumar Anaparti < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I've created a CloudStack Terraform Provider release candidate (RC1) for > > version 0.7.0, with the following artifacts up for testing and a vote: > > > > Git Branch and Commit SHA: > > https://github.com/cloudstack/terraform-provider-cloudstack > > Commit: cd071af12c7bf9d2651c456683ee4d4a85a71882 > > > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > > location): > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/terraform-provider-0.7.0-rc1/ > > > > PGP release keys (signed using D6E0581ECF8A2FBE3FF6B3C9D7CEAE3A9E71D0AA): > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > > > The vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > For testing/voting purposes, you can use this release candidate (RC1) > > provider: > > > > terraform { > > required_providers { > > cloudstack = { > > source = "cloudstack/cloudstack" > > version = "0.7.0-rc1" > > } > > } > > } > > > > > > Regards, > > Suresh > > >
