On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sep 9, 2013, at 5:08 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> Maybe before we get to carried away talking about future releases and > >> more automated testing (which is great and many of us have advocating > >> for and Prasanna has done outstanding working on BVT, jenkins and the > >> test matrix), we need to focus on how to get 4.2 out. > >>> > >>> Marcus has a binding -1, so that means the vote fails and we need > >> another RC (unless someone challenges Marcus's veto and he changes his > >> mind). > >>> > > [Animesh>] Sebastien the VOTE is by majority not a VETO. > > Ah, thought it was consensus. > > should be consensus for releases imho. > > The ASF has defined releases for projects as something that aren't able to be veto'ed. Voting is what counts here. If people are +1, then great! If people are -1, then that's their choice (as I've voted for this RC). I can't block this release as a PMC member. All I can do is vote as I see fit.
