Hello Marty, Marcus, Thanks for the explanation, I have updated the test accordingly.
Regards, Girish On 14-Sep-2013, at 9:37 PM, Marcus Sorensen <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, as Marty mentions they can be on any host, with tagged vlans linking > everything together.If you prefer them on the same host you can write a > custom allocator. The user concentrated algorithm packs VMS together when > possible, and random allocator is self explanatory, but I don't think > either pay attention to the router/guest relationships. > On Sep 14, 2013 1:22 AM, "Girish Shilamkar" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I was under the assumption that virtual router (VR) and vm spawned for an >> account would always be on the same host. Therefore in >> egress rule automation tests we were ssh'ing VR via host on which the vm >> was created. But recently we saw failures in egress rule tests >> as VR was not reachable from host on which vm was created. While debugging >> this issue I found that VR and vm for an account can be on different host. >> It would be great if someone could confirm this. >> >> Thanks ! >> >> Regards, >> Girish >> >>
