got it, thanks Murali is working on it.
2013/9/16 Gaurav Aradhye <gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com> > HI Wei, > > Here's the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4596 > > The issue is that CS is allowing two public or portable ip ranges to > overlap, with different vlan IDs. This is not a valid behavior. > > Regards, > Gaurav > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > What is the ticket for this issue? More details? > > > > > > 2013/9/16 Gaurav Aradhye <gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com> > > > > > HI all, > > > > > > That was a bug in CS and is discussed on another mail thread. > > > This thread can be safely ignored. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Gaurav > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Gaurav Aradhye > > > <gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com>wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > While associating a portable public ip, I'm getting following error: > > > > > > > > errorText:Entity already exists: > > > > > > > > Log says: > > > > > > > > > > com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException: > > > > Duplicate entry 'x.x.x.x - x' for key 'public_ip_address'. > > > > > > > > While the ip address has not been associated before, and I can see it > > > > marked as free, Can anyone point to possible reason why is this > > > happening? > > > > If the IP address lists as free, how does it have entry in associated > > ips > > > > already? > > > > > > > > A "non-portable" ip address get assiciated properly, but error is for > > > > portable one. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Gaurav > > > > > > > > > >
