Sorry, july. Xenserver http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
KVM http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 VMware (generic) http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote: > The stock image is actually from June 2013, I believe. There is a > requirement for a new system vm in 4.2 to support some of the newer > features. It's absolutely necessary to use this image (or one with the > same capabilities) in KVM, maybe less so with Xen. > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> This is for xen. >> the stock image works and it is build in february 2012. >> We did some further investigation. It turns out that due to license >> issues the xen server tools where removed the 6th of september 2012. >> any template newer should not work unless you install >> xe-guest-utilities yourself. bug 29 says >> "patches/systemvm/debian/iptables_1.4.8-3local1checksum1_i386.deb is >> present in the source tree. >> >> This is both a binary and a GPLed software and thus forbidden on two counts." >> >> in 3db9736a0754388d782b45d31e8e36c9966c508e this and another deb file >> and a kernel module where removed from the cloudstack repo. >> patches/systemvm/debian/xe-guest-utilities_5.6.0-595_i386.deb contains >> the service responsible for starting the xe-daemon. >> >> also xe-update-guest-attrs contains calls to 'xestore write', write as >> parameter. On wheezy only xestore-write exists (maybe because of the >> deb files that where not installed) the same goes for 'xenstore rm'. >> Strangely it does contain a call to xenstore-read as well. A cp of >> xenstore-ls to xenstore fixes this as all binaries are copies and is >> it clever about its name. >> >> more is bound to follow, >> Daan >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I'm not sure I understand... my impression from your message is the >>> stock 4.2 image works. This is for Xen, right? Does this mean that >>> there's a step missing in building a custom system vm to make it match >>> the stock image? >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> H, >>>> >>>> The problem is when creating a newer image for the system template as >>>> we did on our installations. It will not work with the 4.2 scripts. I >>>> am not making hard my thread of this being a blocker but it is a >>>> serious impediment for people wanting to harden their cloudstack >>>> environment. >>>> >>>> I am voting a +0 here as I think we are not going to use this distro >>>> for this reason. >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> Daan >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> At Schuberg Philis, we did some tests and noted that the xe-deamon on >>>>> router vms is not started and that xenstore no longer exist under that >>>>> name. >>>>> The xenstore binary is copied to xenstore-write, --ls etc so this >>>>> could be solved. >>>>> >>>>> I am sure how to formulate this as to convince you all this is a >>>>> blocker but am inclined to do so. >>>>> >>>>> more accurate report will follow, >>>>> Daan >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Ian Duffy <i...@ianduffy.ie> wrote: >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Ran against simulator. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 16 September 2013 11:25, Prasanna Santhanam <t...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The test infra has deployed advanced zone with kvm and xenserver 6.2 >>>>>>> since Saturday and I dont see any new failures [1]. So no regressions. >>>>>>> Also ran the simulator against 4.2 [2] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-regression-matrix/ >>>>>>> [2] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/simulator/job/run-checkin-tests/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:18:48PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: >>>>>>> > +1 (binding) >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Tested with simulator. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > +1 (binding) >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: >>>>>>> > > create advanced zone >>>>>>> > > create VPC >>>>>>> > > register template >>>>>>> > > create VPC tier >>>>>>> > > create VM on tier w/NFS >>>>>>> > > create VM on tier w/CLM >>>>>>> > > create VM on tier w/Local storage >>>>>>> > > create static NAT to vm, ssh in >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rajesh Battala >>>>>>> > > <rajesh.batt...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>>>>> > >> +1 >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> Tested VM Life cycle in Xenserver and KVM with Advance Zone >>>>>>> configuration. >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> Thanks >>>>>>> > >> Rajesh Battala >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> > >> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] >>>>>>> > >> Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM >>>>>>> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>>>>>> > >> Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a >>>>>>> vote: >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> Git Branch and Commit SH: >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 >>>>>>> > >> Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> List of changes: >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >>>>>>> > >> location): >>>>>>> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): >>>>>>> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> Testing instructions are here: >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >>>>>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> [ ] +1 approve >>>>>>> > >> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>>>>> > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Prasanna., >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------ >>>>>>> Powered by BigRock.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>>
