The GPL binaries should be provisioned in the template (using tools/appliance/ scripts) and should not be part of the systemvm.iso. The scripts in the iso can be modified as per the provisioned binaries.
Xenserver tools can be made available for all and will facilitate features like dynamic scaling out of the box. On 24/09/13 3:15 pm, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: >meaning that we cannot solve this as proposed bu Joris. What should we >do about making sure hte xenserver tools are on the system vms. should >they go in the template or in the systemvm.iso? The question is kind >of rethorical, the real question is; Are they a standard requirement >that we want available for everyone? > >regards, >Daan > >On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Abhinandan Prateek ><abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> wrote: >> For including xstools in systemvm we will be modifying the scripts. >> The gpl¹d binaries are not part of the distribution. That keeps us in >> clear as far as licensing is concerned. >> >> >> -abhi >> >> On 19/09/13 6:41 pm, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>yes, if someone can tell me if we can include gpl'd binaries in our >>>git/distro I think we should. In that case I will file a bug. >>> >>>regards, >>
