That enabled running without a system vm. But you'd still need a VR if you wanted network services.
On 9/26/13 12:47 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On Sep 26, 2013, at 3:27 AM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > >> >> >> On 09/26/2013 01:38 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote: >>> Is there any technical reason why we couldn't use ubuntu LTS (12.04 >>> and soon to be 14.04) for the system VM. Additionally is there any >>> technical reason we couldn't switch to 64bit. I don't necesarily want >>> to get into "fight for you favorite distro" discussion, just curious. >>> >> >> This still underlines the problem with the SystemVM, it isn't flexible >>enough. >> >> I'm not saying we should change overnight, but the SystemVM should be >>abstracted a lot more so people can throw in their own SystemVM more >>easily. >> >> I created a issue about this last year: >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-451 >> >> I'd like to see this abstracted more so you can drop in any Linux or >>BSD distro you like as long as it talks the API and does what it's asked >>to do. >> >> For Debian based we should be able to create some .deb packages which >>you can simple install and for Redhat some .rpms. >> >> The SystemVMs aren't rocket-science, as a matter of fact, I think the >>are a big mess internally when you see all the scripts. >> >> Wido > >Didn't Chiradeep work on quick cloud to solve some of those issues: > >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud > > > >> >>> Darren >>> >
