Bah - I hit send without dealing with the second question.

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> H,
>
> I started building the docs of the 4.2 tree, using the cfg publican-all.cfg
> I fails. Is there a defined set of targets that must/should build in the
> docs?
>
>
>         Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/zone-add.xml ->
> tmp/en-US/xml/zone-add.xml
> Beginning work on en-US
> Validation failed:
> hypervisor-support-for-primarystorage.xml:6: validity error : ID
> hypervisor-support-for-primarystorage already defined
> add-remove-nic.xml:31: validity error : ID prereq-addnic already defined
> api-throttling.xml:6: validity error : ID api-throttling already defined
> api-throttling.xml:30: validity error : ID api-throttling-configure already
> defined
> api-throttling.xml:61: validity error : ID api-throttling-limitations
> already defined
> globally-configured-limits.xml:6: validity error : ID
> globally-configured-limits already defined
> configure-package-repository.xml:28: validity error : IDREF attribute
> linkend references an unknown ID "sect-source-buildrpm"
> management-server-install-multi-node.xml:30: validity error : IDREF
> attribute linkend references an unknown ID "sect-source-buildrpm"
> using-netscaler-load-balancers.xml:41: validity error : IDREF attribute
> linkend references an unknown ID "external-guest-lb-integration"
> configure-package-repository.xml:28: validity error : IDREF attribute
> linkend references an unknown ID "sect-source-builddebs"
> management-server-install-multi-node.xml:30: validity error : IDREF
> attribute linkend references an unknown ID "sect-source-builddebs"
>
> also the other targets flash by the following
>
> Oct 4, 2013 3:12:03 PM org.apache.fop.hyphenation.Hyphenator
> getHyphenationTree
> SEVERE: Couldn't find hyphenation pattern en
>
> I read I should ignore warnings and this one says severe. How important is
> hyphenation in english?
>
> thanks,
> Daan


You are doing this in the new cloudstack-docs repo on the 4.2 branch?
I have been building admin and install guides, so I know they aren't
broken and don't have validity errors. If it's only publican-all that
is broken I am happy to git rm that file :)

Re FOP warnings, if it builds, ignore them, FOP complains loudly about
lots of things that might matter to people doing magazine layout, but
not to tech manuals.

Reply via email to