That¹s great Benoit. You could have also found this out running the ssvm
health check script.
Thumb rule - In case of ssvm/secondary storage related issues first
troubleshooting step is to run ssvm health check script

On 04/10/13 1:37 AM, "benoit lair" <kurushi4...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>Issue resolved for me.
>
>In my case, my dashboard said me, i have 0kb of storage on my secondary
>storage.
>
>The reason was not due to the cs 4.2, but it was entirely my fault due to
>a
>misconfiguration :
>
>My ssvm was correctly deploying, but it can't communicate with my nfs
>server.
>
>The reason was because i misconfigured my storage traffic label for
>xenserver, so my storage traffic was routed on the bad nic on the
>hypervisor, so the storage vlan was not available et so the ssvm cloudn't
>ping to the nfs server.
>
>If the ssvm can't ping to the nfs server, it can't mount it, if can't
>mount, it does not recognize the right size of the nfs server volume, so
>0kb.
>
>So, if dashboard says secondary storage at 0kb, there is probably a
>network
>issue with my nfs server.
>
>
>Regards, Benoit.
>
>
>2013/10/4 Nitin Mehta <nitin.me...@citrix.com>
>
>> This generally should happen because of management server not able to
>> communicate with the SSVM agent.
>> Could you run the ssvm health check script to see if the connection is
>> healthy btwn ssvm and CS ?
>>
>> On 03/10/13 3:39 AM, "benoit lair" <kurushi4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hello,
>> >
>> >I have the same issue with cs 4.2 installed from the cloudstack rpm
>> >repositories (the stable ones), found no way to get an ssvm
>>operationnal.
>> >
>> >Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>> >2013/9/28 Netmaster <webmas...@colobridge.net>
>> >
>> >> Hallo,
>> >> we have several installation of cloudstack 4.2
>> >> In dashboard the capacity of secondary storage equal 0kb
>> >> We have standart nfs.
>> >> Api backed the same error, capacity of resource type 6 is 0
>> >> The secondary stor vm (system vm) shows normall capacity of 10tb,
>> >> as it have to be.
>> >> Is it bug or known issue?
>> >> Thanks
>>

Reply via email to