I'm personally +1. Simulator seems to work On 10/8/13 3:12 PM, "Darren Shepherd" <darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>So what's the verdict? What would it take for everyone to feel warm >and fuzzy about this merge, given the troubled past this community has >had with Spring. I'm not saying the code is perfect, but so far its >not terribly bad :) > >Darren > >On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Chiradeep Vittal ><chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: >> I'm not getting any notifications of BVT test failures. Where do I >> subscribe? >> >> On 10/8/13 10:20 AM, "Darren Shepherd" <darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >> >From what I can gather it seems that master currently fails the BVT >>>(and know when I say BVT I mean that black box that apparently exists >>>somewhere doing something, but I have no clue what it really means). >>>So in turn my spring modularization branch will additionally fail BVT. >>> Citrix internal QA ran some tests against my branch and they mostly >>>passed but some failed. Its quite difficult to sort through this all >>>because tests are failing on master. So I don't know what to do at >>>this point. At least my branch won't completely blow up everything. >>>I just know the longer it takes to merge this the more painful it will >>>be.... >>> >>>Honestly this is all quite frustrating for myself being new to >>>contributing to ACS. I feel somewhat lost in the whole process of how >>>to get features in. I'll refrain from venting my frustrations. >>> >>>Darren >>
