Hi,

As a part of implementing the SSL termination functioanlity, I was trying to add a protocol parameter to the CreateLoadBalancerRule API so that the correct type of LB can be created to which the certificate can be bound. I see that the LoadBalancerVO is an extension of FirewallVO which has its own protocol field which is used for some other purpose. Why do we have Firewall and LB as the same entity? Also, If I were to add protocol for the LB, is it OK if I create another field "lb_protocol" in the load_balancing_rules table ?

Thanks,
-Syed

Reply via email to