> On July 30, 2013, 3:57 a.m., Soheil Eizadi wrote:
> > In researching this more look like there is a code in NetworkManager that 
> > will set the Network DNS Domain, given proper DNS Capabilities 
> > (Capability.AllowDnsSuffixModification) is set in the DNS Offering. I need 
> > to investigate what happens when the DNS value for Zone is modified, so 
> > perhaps the code in the prepare/release is not needed.
> > 
> >         // If networkDomain is not specified, take it from the global 
> > configuration
> >         if 
> > (_networkModel.areServicesSupportedByNetworkOffering(networkOfferingId, 
> > Service.Dns)) {
> >             Map<Network.Capability, String> dnsCapabilities = 
> > _networkModel.getNetworkOfferingServiceCapabilities
> >                     (_configMgr.getNetworkOffering(networkOfferingId), 
> > Service.Dns);
> >             String isUpdateDnsSupported = 
> > dnsCapabilities.get(Capability.AllowDnsSuffixModification);
> >             if (isUpdateDnsSupported == null || 
> > !Boolean.valueOf(isUpdateDnsSupported)) {
> >                 if (networkDomain != null) {
> >                     // TBD: NetworkOfferingId and zoneId. Send uuids 
> > instead.
> >                     throw new InvalidParameterValueException("Domain name 
> > change is not supported by network offering id="
> >                             + networkOfferingId + " in zone id=" + zoneId);
> >                 }

Reminder - 
Hi,
This review has been pending for long. Please update to "submitted" if this has 
already been committed.
Thanks


- Amogh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12883/#review24205
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 26, 2013, 10:22 p.m., Soheil Eizadi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12883/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 26, 2013, 10:22 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack.
> 
> 
> Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3754
>     
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3754
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> DNS value in Zone is not getting set in the Network created for the Zone. Due 
> to this the prepare and release calls to the Network Plugins are missing this 
> information for the VMs.
> 
> see Jira bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3754 for 
> additional details.
> 
> diff --git a/server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkManagerImpl.java 
> b/server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkManagerImpl.java
> index 8e90cb7..53715c2 100755
> --- a/server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkManagerImpl.java
> +++ b/server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkManagerImpl.java
> @@ -2041,6 +2041,12 @@ public class NetworkManagerImpl extends ManagerBase 
> implements NetworkManager, L
>              dest, ReservationContext context, long nicId, NetworkVO network)
>              throws InsufficientVirtualNetworkCapcityException, 
> InsufficientAddressCapacityException,
>              ConcurrentOperationException, InsufficientCapacityException, 
> ResourceUnavailableException {
> +       
> +       if (dest.getDataCenter().getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic) {
> +               if ((network.getNetworkDomain() == null) && 
> (dest.getDataCenter().getDomain() != null)) {
> +                       
> network.setNetworkDomain(dest.getDataCenter().getDomain());
> +               }
> +       }
>          
>          Integer networkRate = _networkModel.getNetworkRate(network.getId(), 
> vmProfile.getId());
>          NetworkGuru guru = AdapterBase.getAdapterByName(_networkGurus, 
> network.getGuruName());
> @@ -2116,6 +2122,13 @@ public class NetworkManagerImpl extends ManagerBase 
> implements NetworkManager, L
>                      s_logger.error("NetworkGuru "+guru+" prepareForMigration 
> failed."); // XXX: Transaction error
>                  }
>              }
> +            
> +               if (dest.getDataCenter().getNetworkType() == 
> NetworkType.Basic) {
> +                       if ((network.getNetworkDomain() == null) && 
> (dest.getDataCenter().getDomain() != null)) {
> +                               
> network.setNetworkDomain(dest.getDataCenter().getDomain());
> +                       }
> +               }
> +               
>              for (NetworkElement element : _networkElements) {
>                  if(element instanceof NetworkMigrationResponder){
>                      if(!((NetworkMigrationResponder) 
> element).prepareMigration(profile, network, vm, dest, context)){
> @@ -2238,7 +2251,14 @@ public class NetworkManagerImpl extends ManagerBase 
> implements NetworkManager, L
>                  //commit the transaction before proceeding releasing nic 
> profile on the network elements
>                  txn.commit();
>  
> -                // Perform release on network elements
> +                DataCenterVO zone = 
> _dcDao.findById(network.getDataCenterId());
> +                if ( zone.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic) {
> +                       if ((network.getNetworkDomain() == null) && 
> (zone.getDomain() != null)) {
> +                               network.setNetworkDomain(zone.getDomain());
> +                       }
> +               }
> +               
> +               // Perform release on network elements
>                  for (NetworkElement element : _networkElements) {
>                      if (s_logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
>                          s_logger.debug("Asking " + element.getName() + " to 
> release " + nic);
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12883/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Validated that the defaultGuestNetwork created had the DNS Domain value set 
> to NULL.
> 
> I mades sure that calls to prepare/release to Network Element Plugins had the 
> DNS Domain set to the Zone value.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Soheil Eizadi
> 
>

Reply via email to