VNF = virtualized network function (e.g., LB virtual appliance)
NFV = network functions virtualization (the whole kit and caboodle)

On 11/12/13 6:53 AM, "sebgoa" <run...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>On Nov 12, 2013, at 7:21 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
><chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> OK, here's the draft of the Liaison request (template borrowed from
>> OpenDaylight)
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> To:
>> ETSI Industry Study Group (ISG) on Network Functions Virtualization
>> Prodip Sen, Chairman NFV ISG prodip....@verizon.com
>> Andrew Malis, NFV Liaison Officer <andrew.g.ma...@verizon.com>
>> 
>> I am a member of the Apache CloudStack Project Management Committee
>>(PMC)
>> and have been asked to serve as liaison from the Apache CloudStack
>> community to the ETSI Industry Standard Group on Network Functions
>> Virtualization.
>> 
>> Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage
>> large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly
>>scalable
>> Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.  The
>>platform
>> has pioneered the use of VNF to provide network services to IAAS
>>tenants.
>
>NFV ????? not VNF ?
>
>> We are excited to see that NFV is going to realize its potential and
>>look
>> forward to collaborating to realize this promise expeditiously.
>> 
>> The community would like to suggest these areas of collaboration:
>> 
>> 1)  ETSI NFV ISG Documents: It would be very helpful to receive pointers
>> to the various documents being produced by the ETSI NFV ISG, even before
>> their formal publication, so that your needs can be incorporated into
>>the
>> Apache CloudStack development effort.
>> 
>> 2)  Sharing ideas and experience: We have many shared goals and a large
>> community of experienced cloud implementors. We have several
>>opportunities
>> where someone from ETSI NFV ISG could present to the Apache CloudStack
>> community, including meetups and online fora , and our CloudStack
>> Collaboration Summit. We would also be quite pleased to present on
>>Apache
>> CloudStack to ETSI NFV ISG in any forum you find appropriate. If
>> appropriate we can participate in working groups such as the MANO WG.
>> 
>> 3)  Open Source:  We would love to get members of the  ETSI NFV ISG
>> participate in our community, especially in design ideas, code
>> contributions and the like. We hope that we can assist in producing
>> reference implementations and help iterate faster on crucial issues such
>> as interoperability.
>> 
>> Of course we welcome other ideas for collaboration with the NFV ISG.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>--
>> -----
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 11/11/13 1:02 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" <run...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> How about Chiradeep makes the contact and proposal for CloudStack to
>>> join/be represented ?
>>> 
>>> Then we can decide who is the representative. Daan could do it and
>>>Nguyen
>>> could be the substitute ?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Nov 9, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I don't mind being involved if needed.
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Chip Childers
>>>><chipchild...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:58:17AM +0700, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote:
>>>>>> 2013/11/7 Chiradeep Vittal <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> While I appreciate the confidence, there are weekly calls to
>>>>>>>attend.
>>>>>>> The particularly interesting one (MANO WG) happens on Wednesdays at
>>>>>>> 6am
>>>>>>> PST.
>>>>>>> I've tried but there's very little chance that I can attend these
>>>>>>> meetings.
>>>>>>> Anybody in a more agreeable timezone?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Not sure if I have permitted to join, I'm in agreeable timezone (9pm
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> local time). It's great and I'm willing to join to liaison team.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'd say you are...  you're a committer on the project.  Perhaps you
>>>>>and
>>>>> Chiradeep can discuss how to get involved?
>>> 
>> 
>

Reply via email to