Use the links from the Install Guide instead.

http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#prepare-system-vm-template

Travis

On Nov 25, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote:

> In trying to troubleshoot I think I have found another issue.  I went looking 
> for a 'more official' source for the system templates.  I found this: 
> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Release_Notes/upgrade-instructions.html#upgrade-from-3.0.x-to-4.0
> 
> Which gives a system vm template of (for xen server): 
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
> 
> Unfortunately, those system vm templates do not come up (check the attached 
> files for images).  Basically, the file system comes up as Read Only...
> 
> I will go back to the buildacloud system templates to see if I can get them 
> working...  
> 
> Would love to have someone confirm where we should be getting the System VM 
> Templates from for 4.2+.
> 
> Still trying to get System VM Templates to work on 4.3.  If anyone has this 
> working, please post how you get them working and where you got them from.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Will
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote:
> I will try this as a temporary solution.  Thank you...
> 
> Will
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Murali Reddy <murali.re...@citrix.com> wrote:
> 
> Don¹t understand problem well enough for clean fix, but I updated
> 'template_version' from 3.0 to 4.3 of the VR in the domain_router table
> that resolved the issue for me.
> 
> On 22/11/13 3:50 PM, "Will Stevens" <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote:
> 
> >Has anyone been able to resolve this issue?  This is holding up my ability
> >to launch VMs and test the fixes to my plugin.  I need to resolve this
> >issue to move forward...
> >
> >@Syed, are you still stuck on this as well?
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Will
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Syed Ahmed <sah...@cloudops.com> wrote:
> >
> >> OK here is how far I got debugging this. I think I am missing a small
> >> thing. I hope you guys can help.
> >>
> >> So my VM template has the correct version.
> >>
> >> root@eng-ns-dev-cs1: /export/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1 # strings
> >> f3fc75d9-0240-4c71-a3bf-fb65652e4763.vhd  | grep Cloudstack
> >>
> >> Cloudstack Release*  4.2.0*Tue Nov 19 23:22:37 UTC 2013
> >>
> >>
> >> But in the database I see the following ( table domain_router )
> >>
> >> *************************** 4. row ***************************
> >>                  id: 11
> >>          element_id: 4
> >>  public_mac_address: 06:48:a8:00:00:68
> >>   public_ip_address: 172.30.91.102
> >>      public_netmask: 255.255.255.0
> >>       guest_netmask: NULL
> >>    guest_ip_address: NULL
> >> is_redundant_router: 0
> >>            priority: 0
> >>  is_priority_bumpup: 0
> >>     redundant_state: UNKNOWN
> >>        stop_pending: 0
> >>                role: VIRTUAL_ROUTER
> >>    template_version:*Cloudstack Release 3.0 Mon Feb 6 15:10:04 PST 2012*
> >>     scripts_version: 725d5e5901a62c68aed0dd3463023518
> >>              vpc_id: NULL
> >> 4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I guess this is populated from the VM that gets created. On the xen the
> >>vm
> >> is r-11. I see the following version on that VM
> >>
> >> root@r-11-VM:~# cat /etc/cloudstack-release
> >> Cloudstack Release 3.0 Mon Feb  6 15:10:04 PST 2012
> >>
> >>
> >> This means that Xen is not picking up the template present in the
> >> secondary storage. Does Xen cache the vhd files locally to avoid coming
> >>to
> >> the secondary storage? If so, how can I disable that?
> >>
> >> Also, I was looking at UpgradeRouterTemplateCmd API which basically goes
> >> through all the VRs and reboots them. It expects that when the reboot is
> >> completed, the router should have picked up the 4.2.0 version of the
> >> template ( see line 4072 in VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java ) I
> >> try to do the reboot manually but the template remains the same. Do you
> >> guys have any more suggestions?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Syed
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed 20 Nov 2013 12:55:04 PM EST, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> FYI.
> >>>
> >>> I upgraded from 2.2.14 to 4.2.1. The CPVM, SSVM and VRs are working
> >>>after
> >>> running *cloudstack-sysvmadm to recreate.*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2013/11/20 Syed Ahmed <sah...@cloudops.com>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> +1 Same error. The secondary storage VM and the Console proxy VM seem
> >>>>to
> >>>> be coming up alright. I see this error only when starting the virtual
> >>>> router which is preventing me from creating any instances.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed 20 Nov 2013 11:14:47 AM EST, Will Stevens wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> I am having the same problem. I got the latest system VMs from:
> >>>>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/
> >>>>> lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Are these the wrong System VM Templates? If so, where should I get
> >>>>>the
> >>>>> System VM Templates to make this work again?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Alena Prokharchyk <
> >>>>> alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nitin, I had the same problem, but I fixed it by uploading 4.2 system
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> templates to my secondary storage. Make sure you have the latest
> >>>>>>too.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -alena.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> From: Nitin Mehta <nitin.me...@citrix.com<mailto:
> >>>>>> nitin.me...@citrix.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Reply-To:
> >>>>>>"dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >>>>>> >"
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> >>>>>> Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013 4:16 PM
> >>>>>> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" <
> >>>>>> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> >>>>>> Subject: Router requires upgrade. Unable to send command to router
> >>>>>> Error
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Unable to deploy vms in the latest master because of the commit
> >>>>>>below.
> >>>>>> Is
> >>>>>> anyone noticing this on the latest master.
> >>>>>> I checked the code and there was a commit made recently 3f5b8f
> >>>>>>which is
> >>>>>> where the exception points to.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> WARN [o.a.c.alerts] (CapacityChecker:ctx-4f1ef01f) alertType:: 2 //
> >>>>>> dataCenterId:: 3 // podId:: 3 // clusterId:: null // message::
> >>>>>>System
> >>>>>> Alert: Low Available Storage in cluster c3 pod p of availability
> >>>>>>zone
> >>>>>> z3
> >>>>>> INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor] (Job-Executor-1:ctx-f118d6dc) Add
> >>>>>> job-44 into job monitoring
> >>>>>> WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-26:ctx-3e786331)
> >>>>>> Detecting a change in xstoolsversion for r-6-VM
> >>>>>> ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-1:ctx-f118d6dc
> >>>>>> ctx-d9a00f18) Failed to start instance
> >>>>>> VM[User|VM-4d5d5db2-e5ba-4bbd-b1dc-e749ac42a74c]
> >>>>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Router requires
> >>>>>> upgrade.
> >>>>>> Unable to send command to router:6
> >>>>>> at
> >>>>>> com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManager
> >>>>>> Impl.sendCommandsToRouter(VirtualNetworkApplianceManager
> >>>>>> Impl.java:3567)
> >>>>>> at
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl$7.execute
> >>>>>>(
> >>>>>> VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3003)
> >>>>>> at
> >>>>>> com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManager
> >>>>>> Impl.applyRules(
> >>>>>> VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3848)
> >>>>>> at
> >>>>>> com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManager
> >>>>>> Impl.applyDhcpEntry(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:2995)
> >>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >>>>>> at
> >>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >>>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> >>>>>> at
> >>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >>>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to