Hi, Thank you all for the feedback! - stretching: yes, that is true and it does not look good - apache: If I have to put the apache there, then I will have to completely rearrange the design. Are you sure it is a must-have? Wikipedia displays a logo without the "apache". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_CloudStack - etc: the "powered by" font type does not go well with the "cloudstack"
I go back to my drawing board and see what I can do for v0.0.2 On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <[email protected]>wrote: > I like, > 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there. > I think it must even. > 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <[email protected]> > >> To: [email protected] > >> Cc: [email protected] > >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM > >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Here is my version: > >> - SVG format as you requested > >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I prefer > few > >> colors for such pictures > >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs to > fit > >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the > >> monkey is übercool anyway) > >> - if no monkey, then cloud > >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make > >> difficult to read in such a small place > >> - see attached file :) > > > > Hi, > > > > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to be > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so cute.) > > > > Two things - > > > > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's intentional, not > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my screen... :) > > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it > shouldn't be added in... legal, etc)? > > > > -robyn > > > > > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi folks: > >> > > >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I > >> > have a great opportunity for you :) > >> > > >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and is > >> > also attractive. > >> > > >> > A couple examples of powered by logos: > >> > > >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif > >> > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000 > >> > > >> > > https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png > >> > > >> > A couple of constraints: > >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it > >> > will make life simpler) > >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us to > >> > scale/etc) > >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different that > >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement around > >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as that > >> > sentence makes it out to be.) > >> > > >> > Anyone interested? > >> > > >> > --David > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> EOF > >> > -- EOF
