In fact I've written something on wiki to help people to understand redundant router, but may not covered anything of RvR.
Here is for your reference: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Redundant+Virtual+Router+Functional+Spec --Sheng On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>wrote: > Alex, I think Sheng build the RvR before Cloudstack was donated to > Apache by Citrix. i.e. no review id > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Alex Ough <alex.o...@sungard.com> wrote: > > Hi Sheng, good to hear from you! > > > > Btw, can I get the review request id of the RvR so that I can get > > information of how it was implemented? > > > > Thanks > > Alex Ough > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > > > >> I meant, VPC and redundant router. :) > >> > >> --Sheng > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > >> > >> > Sure! > >> > > >> > Yes, I am the right person for VPC. :) > >> > > >> > Redundant router for VPC would be a great improvement for CloudStack, > I > >> > just haven't got enough time to work on that. > >> > > >> > I think the design would works mostly the same way, but there are > things > >> > become more tricky for VPC e.g. hot plug nics and un-consequences > public > >> > nics in the VPC VR(if multiple vlan is necessary). Many if not all > >> scripts > >> > in the VR need to be changed to follow VPC > >> > > >> > I would very glad to help on RvR for VPC. > >> > > >> > Thanks. > >> > > >> > --Sheng > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Alex Ough <alex.o...@sungard.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi Sheng, > >> >> > >> >> I hope you're the right person for this, but if not, please let me > know. > >> >> > >> >> Currently I'm planning to work on the redundant routers in VPC > >> >> (CLOUDSTACK-764) because my company will need this feature in the > near > >> >> future and you seem to have implemented the RvR in non-VPC networks. > >> >> > >> >> I think it is appropriate to follow the same implementation with > yours, > >> >> so can I get the review request information of this implementation so > >> that > >> >> I can reference your implementation if possible? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks. > >> >> Alex Ough > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> >