On Dec 12, 2013, at 3:08 AM, Abhinandan Prateek <abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > On 11/12/13 11:24 pm, "Chip Childers" <chipchild...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 05:56:50PM +0100, Daan Hoogland wrote: >>> Though I'm out of principle not very appreciative for the 'extra' >>> fixes form RC to RC, ... >> >> Looking at the log, it seems that most of the activity are tied to test >> script fixes. That sort-of makes sense, but at the same time it >> triggers the idea that Prasanna proposed earlier... do we separate the >> tests from the core project at some point. >> >> Other commits are clearly bug fixes, which are appropriate IMO. > > Is there a way to lock a particular branch after an RC has been cut ? With > so many developers distributed across the globe I think it is very > difficult to control the commits going into a branch after RC has been > cut. As a RN I can only go thru the commits and see if any of those can > cause unwanted changes and try to test those out. >> > Abhi, as RN I would support you if you wanted to revert commits made to the branch until the release is out. You can call for a code/commit freeze, with you as the only committer to the branch. -sebastien
