Yes, please go ahead and file the bug against CS UI component. -Alena.
On 12/18/13, 11:31 AM, "Syed Ahmed" <sah...@cloudops.com> wrote: >Thanks Alena, > >I see that both Elastic LB and Elastic IP are set to false. Looks like >a bug then. > >-Syed > >On Wed 18 Dec 2013 02:22:52 PM EST, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >> Syed, >> >> You can get this info from the network offering of your network. >> >> http://localhost:8096/?command=listNetworkOfferings&id= >> >> >> Š. >> <capability> >> <name>ElasticLb</name> >> <value>false</value> >> >> >> ŠŠ. >> >> -Alena. >> >> On 12/18/13, 11:19 AM, "Syed Ahmed" <sah...@cloudops.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the reply Alena, >>> >>> I have an isolated network which has Netscaler as the LB provider. Does >>> that enable elastic LB? I was looking at the other default network >>> offering for elastic LB and did not find anything like "elastic LB" or >>> "elastic IP" in the service capabilities. How Do I know if elastic LB >>>is >>> enabled or not? >>> >>> -Syed >>> >>> On 12/18/2013 02:05 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >>>> Syed, is ElasticLB support enabled in your network? If yes, then its >>>>ok >>>> to >>>> see 2 tabs. >>>> >>>> When you go 1) Network->Add LB, the ip address for your lb rule will >>>>get >>>> allocated on the fly as a part of LB rule creation as a part of >>>>elastic >>>> Lb >>>> functionality. >>>> >>>> You can add more lb rules for the public ip address associated on the >>>> previous step; for that you have to go 2) path, select the IP and >>>> create a >>>> rule for it. >>>> >>>> If elastic LB is not enabled on the network, seeing 1) path in the UI >>>> is a >>>> UI bug. >>>> >>>> -Alena. >>>> >>>> On 12/18/13, 8:48 AM, "Syed Ahmed" <sah...@cloudops.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> In the UI there are two places where we can add a loadbalancer rule. >>>>> >>>>> 1) Network-> myNetwork -> Add Load Balancer tab >>>>> 2) Network -> myNetwork -> View IP Addresses -> [IP] -> Configuration >>>>> -> >>>>> LoadBalancing ( View All ) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What is the difference between those two? Adding a rule on (2) seems >>>>>to >>>>> work but when I try to add it on (1) it fails saying cannot allocate >>>>> source IP. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> -Syed >>> >> > >
